Reverse Convertibles are short-term bonds generally marketed to individuals that convert into stock if a company’s share price plummets.
Banks sold more than $6 billion of bonds linked to the performance of stocks last year, promising returns of as much as 64 percent at a time when interest rates were at historic lows.
Instead of reaping such extraordinary gains, reverse convertibles, as the products are known, lost 1 percent on average.
Those were the lucky ones. Here's some of the unlucky ones: Click on the charts for a larger picture.
Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc sold $1.15 million in three-month notes tied to Eastman Kodak Co. on June 10 that paid 24 percent annualized interest. That’s 24 times the average rate on one-year certificates of deposit.
Buyers couldn’t lose money unless shares of the camera maker fell to below $3.54 from $5.06. Kodak dropped to $3.50 on Aug. 31 in New York trading. RBS converted the bonds into stock and investors lost about 18 percent even with the high interest rate.

Sheee

On May 11, JPMorgan sold $800,000 of reverse convertib

Three day

Now, that's just darned unlucky in my opinion. Want to see how unlucky? Check out the chart....

Hmmm. TIVO's puttering around $10 per share, then somebody decides it's worth A LOT more on March 4th. JP Morgan sells 800K worth of Reverse Convertibles in May. Then darned if we don't get the old adverse court ruling and it's right back down again.


Curious. No one thought TIVO was worth more than $12 a share for 6 years. Then in one day it goes to $18. JPM sells some convertibles, then a 42% gap-down three days later. Now it's back to the old range. Weird.

